Timely reflections on the current state of our grizzly affairs


Friday, December 31, 2004

2004: Year of the grizzly?

The end of every calendar year brings three things: holidays, skiing, and reflection.

When you're working on grizzly bear conservation, one thing you want to know as you reflect on the year is how many grizzlies died as a result of human activity. Last year in Alberta it was more than 40, an extremely large number given the estimated number of bears in the province (500-700). Research indicates that for every grizzly we know was killed, another one probably died out of sight and out of mind, so these numbers (as high as 80+) are way too high when we know that grizzly bears can sustain no more than a four per cent rate of human-caused mortality.

This year, the number is ... unknown. Despite the fact grizzlies have been denned up for at least a month, the government hasn't released the data yet, and it's always hard to get, like pulling an abcessed tooth from the mouth of a grumpy grizzly. Like every year at this time, I sent off an e-mail to Bruce Treichel, asking him for the grizzly bear mortality statistics for the year. And like every year, I prepare to wait and wait and wait. Treichel is a provincial wildlife allocation specialist with Alberta's Ministry of Sustainable Development. He is the go-to guy for this kind of information.

Down in the U.S., this kind of information is readily available, part of a more robust democratic process that allows citizens and citizen groups to access the information they need to actively participate in the management of their natural resources. (See the New York Times for the most recent article on grizzly bear mortality this year.)

But here in Alberta, this information is hard to come by. Data and data layers gathered about public lands and issues using public money are difficult or impossible to access. Why? Because information is power, and in Alberta the government likes to keep as much of that as they can for themselves. The gov doesn't want the public to know how poorly it has been managing Alberta's resources, and how degraded Alberta's natural capital has become over the last thirty years. This points as much to the democratic deficit here in Alberta as it does to Alberta's inadequate land use policies and the government's irresponsible and negelectful management of our precious natural assets.

Bruce will eventually cough up the number of grizzly bears that were killed this year. Rumour has it that only six grizzlies were killed in the officially sanctioned hunt, and 12 more were killed as a result of self-defence, cars and trains, poaching, and so-called "problem" animals that got into garbage or posed a threat to human safety or property. This is less than half the number killed last year, which is good news. But with a small population eeking a living out of a highly compromised landscape, it may still be too high.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Love that 2nd last paragraph. The same goes for health care and justice. Only in silence can abuse go on. and in withholding information, there is power due to keeping public ignorant and uninformed...

Everywhere else in Canada, the provinces have a confidentiality clause and consents to be signed, but in ALberta the FOIP, permits the government to continue to withhold information...